December 15, 2006 03:34 PM
Want to help define a new publisher's brand, while leaving your mark on the first book series dedicated to user experience? Then consider responding to our cover design RFP, as follows:
Request for Proposal: Rosenfeld Media Cover Design
Rosenfeld Media seeks to engage a partner to design a book cover theme for a new series of user experience methods books. The theme will reflect the unique focus of each book, while incorporating consistent and common visual elements that reflect and reinforce the brand.
Background
Founded in late 2005, Rosenfeld Media (www.rosenfeldmedia.com) is a publishing house dedicated to developing short, practical, and useful books on user experience design. Our books explain the design and research methods that web professionals need to make informed design decisions.
Audience
The primary audience for the books is design professionals who seek tools that help them make more informed design decisions. These professionals come from a wide variety of backgrounds—from graphic design and interaction design to business analysis and marketing—and typically focus on designing digital experiences. Secondary audiences include designers of non-digital experiences, web designers and developers who seek to professionalize their practices, and senior UX practitioners who will use our books to educate their managers and team members.
Because these books are sold directly, they will rarely be displayed on traditional retailers’ shelves. The audience, therefore, may not be seeing them in line with similar books, but they will still compete for a reader’s attention in other ways.
Branding
Rosenfeld Media upholds some attributes that we use to consistently position the publications. The designer can also use these as inspiration:
- practical
- nuts-and-bolts
- attentive to good design
- purposeful
- accessible
- approachable
- usable
- useful
- welcoming
- warm
- serious without taking itself too seriously
Design Requirements
Rosenfeld Media encourages our partner to explore fairly unconventional ideas for the design, introducing new concepts that can be represented on the front and back covers. In doing so, there are required elements that the designer should keep in mind:
- Front cover: Book name, author name, publisher name
- Spine: Book name, author name, publisher mark
- Back cover: Book reviews and testimonials, publisher mark, website URL, book description/what you’ll find inside
- Size: 6”x9”
- Length: typically 150-200 pages
- Bindery: Perfect bound
Competition
Publishers such as New Riders, Peachpit, Morgan Kaufmann, and O’Reilly have begun to publish books on user experience design. Most are relatively long (400-600 pages) and educate readers about the “whats” and “whys” of UX. Of these, O’Reilly is the only one that has a strong visual design for a series, relying on consistent typography, color, and, most recognizably, iconography (each cover features a Dover woodcut animal engraving). The others have not succeeded in presenting their titles consistently. While it appears that the “O’Reilly approach” works well, RM is open to non-iconographic means for achieving this consistency.
Proposal Requirements
The designer should demonstrate how she proposes to meet the design requirements through the following:
- One to two-page proposal in PDF format
- Portfolio or examples of relevant work
- Estimated cost for project
- Professional references
The Rosenfeld Media team will choose a designer based on her prior design experience and vision for this particular project. Any questions prior to the deadline should be directed to the publisher at lou (at) rosenfeldmedia.com.
Process Guidelines
Please submit your proposal in response to this RFP by close of business on January 15, 2007. Please submit by email to: lou (at) rosenfeldmedia.com. Rosenfeld Media intends to award a contract to the selected partner on February 2, 2007. The design partner should be prepared to begin work on the project shortly after the award date.
Comments
Heya Lou and Crew,
I was wondering if you could elaborate on what you are looking for in the proposal. From what I can glean above, you are not necessarily looking for just the design itself, but for the approach to the design as well as the designer's philosophy behind the creation of the design. Just wondering if you had any further thoughts or comments on that, and/or if I am even on the right page.
BTW, this is a very compelling project, for your brand, and for the chosen designer, and in the spirit of online collaboration I think it would be really neat if exposed some of the project's entries and decision-making after the project is awarded for all to see.
Best,
--Ben
Posted by: Benjamin Listwon | December 21, 2006 12:58 AM
Hi Ben, thanks for the comment. At this point, we're not looking for a design (not trying to get designers to do free work for us!), but just a straightforward proposal with standard supporting materials (portfolio examples, references). The proposal itself could describe the designer's connection to/interest in user experience, past work in this area or other relevant areas, interest in RM's approach, etc. Does that help clear things up for you?
It definitely would be interesting and enlightening to expose the entries and decision-making process. But this is a pretty standard RFP, and we didn't mention an open book approach before, so it wouldn't be fair to applicants to expose their proposals or our reactions to them.
Great comments/questions; thanks Ben!
Posted by: Lou | December 22, 2006 07:49 AM
Hi Lou,
I'm loving the illustrations in the Mike and Allen Backcountry ski books. I'm also quite a fan of Rubes (Leigh Rubin) the cartoonist. I'm not connected with these people (though I have met Rubes at the UPA last yeah, a great bloke).
Just a couple of crazy ideas.
Carl
Posted by: carl myhill | December 27, 2006 07:11 AM
Thanks for the kind words, Carl.
I had a great time at the UPA...wonderful group of folks!!
Have a fun and funny New Year!
Leigh
Posted by: Leigh Rubin | January 1, 2007 02:40 AM
Thanks for the answers Lou, it does help to clarify things. As for posting the proposals/designs, I completely understand not wanting to expose entries from the closed entry process.
I do look forward to hearing about the results in general though, and ultimately to the final product of the entire process!
--Ben
Posted by: Benjamin Listwon | January 2, 2007 11:18 PM